So do you believe innovation has to occur naturally?
I think it’s something you can set up an ecosystem to encourage. Obviously hiring smart people, giving enough investment, giving people time and space to play and explore is definitely a way of investing in this idea of innovation, but you have to understand innovation is a long-term thing…
So what you often find is that the innovators are the ones who create the technology, but it takes a designer to understand the impact of that innovation and package it in a way that users actually want.” – Andy Budd
It seems easy to accept that the concept of innovation should be seen as a long-term thing and that time must be the combination of “true” innovations so the “desired” innovation become the success we have seen with some products or even services.
We can’t say the same about creative problem solving that have an emergency character quite different.
In this sense what users want may be in fact what we seek to create and add value.
But this is not always the case!
What people want is not always what people need! It is very often what people desire, or as Antoine De Saint Exupery said:
“The meaning of things lies not in the things themselves, but in our attitude towards them.”
That long period referred by Andy Budd is the time required to understand and integrate connections that represent the hidden or not aware needs of consumers or users.
Sometimes to know the opinion of the people may not seem to be the more correct attitude to develop a product or service that can be simultaneously innovative and respond to a real need.
This does not mean that people should give up their tastes or trends or should no longer agree with the ecosystem where they are inserted. It means that the search to identify the needs must be made, not through GPS but through a compass that gives us the direction to identify opportunities and at the same time the possibility of different approaches.
I think the best way for a company to understand what people want is through a process of openness, not neglecting chances of co-creation and keeping close to the consumers/users.
This way it is possible to discover in consumer behavior, supported by some research, that the vast majority of purchasing decisions are made in an emotional basis and experts (Bruce Lipton) estimate that up to 95% of purchase behavior originated at the subconscious level.
Therefore we need to apply a research through observation of people in their environments, to be able to propose to that people the products or services that are missing to them.
There is a significant difference between what people need and what they would like to. This means that we will have to find the best ways to put the questions so we can get the best answers.
Some techniques of psychology and anthropology can help us understand how people think filtering what they want to say to us. Analyzing contradictions in what people say, look at the real life or combine several techniques can give us a framed picture of the real needs of people.
We know that people live in groups, communities or systems and act as units of relationship between themselves. They are not independent units.
There are two kinds of needs which in my opinion should be over worked not to run the risk of being creating dream solutions but with no applicability.
On the one hand we have not articulated needs, that is, those that exist but that users or consumers fail to clearly expose and whose message needs our help to translate into understandable language.
On the other hand, the “hidden needs” that are the kinds of things that people really want, but are unaware or do not feel this need. Those needs only manifest themselves in plans for future (building scenarios) and are often a result of a change in the environment or in the evolutionary process of each one of them.
Innovate to meet the needs of the people is a hard marathon!
Do you want to comment?
This post was originally published in OpenMind
- Transforming a Manager into a Leader with a Design Thinking Mindset
- Interdisciplinarity and data science on the road to innovation
- They are not analog, they are not digital … they are people!
- Shake up cognitive dissonance and embrace innovation
- Tacit knowledge is a trigger and a lever for innovation! Is it true?
TagsAnalyses and intuition Art and innovation Ask questions Assumptions and innovation Behavior and innovation Behavior change Business model Business models Collaboration and innovation Connections and creativity Create value Creativity and diversity Creativity and empathy Creativity and sustainability Critical thinking Designthinking Design thinking and business Diversity and creativity Diversity and Innovation Emotional experiences Empathy and innovation Evaluation of ideas Innovation and Human Resources Innovation and Management Innovation and networks Innovation and observation Innovation and possibilities Innovation and trust Innovation Culture Inovattion Institute for the Future Interception of ideas Intuitive thinking Making decisions Marty Neumeir Motivation and collaboration Open Innovation Services Passion and creativity Protoypes Resistance to change Rethinking options Simplicity and innovation Time and creativity values and innovation White space
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- February 2016
- March 2014
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011