Cognitive dissonance and ethics
Creativity can be defined as the ability to produce ideas that are original and unexpected but at the same time useful.
The personal characteristics of each one of us, the attraction to complexity or ambiguity tolerance are factors considered vital to the creative process, but the context factors also influence creativity.
“High levels of divergent thinking and cognitive flexibility are likely to be associated with dishonest behavior when individuals are motivated to think creatively, either because of their own personalities or because of cues in the surrounding environment. – Francesca Gino and Dan Ariely
Using divergent thinking we can create new options and we are therefore able to multiply them to understand and apply the consumer behavior in the creation of new products or new experiences.
Divergent thinking is also a form that we have at our disposal to develop unique ways to break the rules.
But “To break the rules, you must first master them – 40 years ago, Audemars Piguet broke all rules of fine watchmaking when in 1972 it introduced the ground-breaking design of the Royal Oak, the first luxury sports watch in Haute Horlogerie.
Break the rules or ignore the rules, especially moral rules, can be a negative side of our creative activity.
If we use our creative ability for not being firm in the pursuit of our ethical standards and moral values and with the help of our cognitive flexibility we reread information to justify our immoral actions, we’re creating the dark side of creativity.
Creativity has neither time nor place nor is an ability of a particular discipline. Creativity arises both in painting as in technology, both in cooking as in accounting, but sometimes the ethical issues are more urgent.
“By definition, creativity is morally neutral. The myth that it’s good is a dangerous misconception. Societies must constantly strive to ensure that novel ideas in government, business, education, and every other realm are wedded to strong ethical values.” – Teresa Amabile
So what happens when we fall back on our abilities to justify our ethical attitudes and build beautiful stories that sponsor our decisions?
The way, how we deal with two thoughts that contradict themselves, can be by reducing this dissonance by altering the existing conditions with the introduction of new conditions that create more consistency.
People often interpret the same information radically different ways to support their own views of the world. To give our opinion on a controversial point, we conveniently forget what goes against our own theory and remember everything that fits.
People quickly adjust its values to adjust their behavior, even when it is clearly immoral.
“The ability of most people to behave dishonestly might be bounded by their ability to cheat and at the same time feel that they are behaving as moral individuals. To the extent that creativity allows people to more easily behave dishonestly and rationalize this behavior, creativity might be a more general driver of this type of dishonesty and play a useful role in understanding unethical behavior.”- Mazar
The duel between the evil and the good or between the comfort of elaborate justifications but biased and the discomfort of acceptance of failure tends to be won by cheating.
Do you want to comment?
- Transforming a Manager into a Leader with a Design Thinking Mindset
- Interdisciplinarity and data science on the road to innovation
- They are not analog, they are not digital … they are people!
- Shake up cognitive dissonance and embrace innovation
- Tacit knowledge is a trigger and a lever for innovation! Is it true?
TagsAnalyses and intuition Art and innovation Ask questions Assumptions and innovation Behavior and innovation Behavior change Business model Business models Collaboration and innovation Connections and creativity Create value Creativity and diversity Creativity and empathy Creativity and sustainability Critical thinking Designthinking Design thinking and business Diversity and creativity Diversity and Innovation Emotional experiences Empathy and innovation Evaluation of ideas Innovation and Human Resources Innovation and Management Innovation and networks Innovation and observation Innovation and possibilities Innovation and trust Innovation Culture Inovattion Institute for the Future Interception of ideas Intuitive thinking Making decisions Marty Neumeir Motivation and collaboration Open Innovation Services Passion and creativity Protoypes Resistance to change Rethinking options Simplicity and innovation Time and creativity values and innovation White space
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- February 2016
- March 2014
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011