If I knew, I …!
There are things that cause amazement, and there are others that seem to be part of naturalness and normalcy of a large number of people.
For example, it wouldn’t cause amazement that many people consume their time talking about brilliant stuff worthless or trifles and do not seek to clarify ideas or the most relevant aspects of the themes of the conversations in which they participate.
It seems that there is a tendency to consume time without the worry of finding something that makes sense in the conversation.
But I am surprised that some (many) people did not become fully aware of our need for a lifelong learning and also that they are not aware that yesterday’s skills are not necessarily the competences of the future, especially when the environment is the work.
Our ability to determine the deeper meaning or importance of what is being expressed at a given moment is one of the most important skills for the future labor forces.
But, if to be able to find the true meaning of things is important, it is also true that the leadership, building teams (not the formation of groups) and especially creativity are competences of the future that surely will not be part of the “profile of intelligent machines”.
There are many tasks and even “functions” that can be occupied by “intelligent machines”, as for example the routine work in manufacturing and services, but it won’t be as easy to accept that the machines will in future compete for places that require skills that allow to find meaning in things or allow to make critical readings for decision-making.
Critical thinking is a skill that the future will require and it is important to get right now to capitalize.
This means that we cannot make use of the knowledge that we are integrating lifelong learning without it first makes sense in our mind. It is important to find relevant information to increase our critical capacity.
When we draw pieces of information that seem relevant according to the context in which we operate, and it is very important to the contextualization of information, we can create something new that can be interpreted.
In fact what we need is to process this information, reading and ideas so that they combine into something more useful or more significantly stay together.
When we want to build something that is a reality in the future, we need to understand how people think today “and also seeking to understand how they are going to think about the future “.
A projection is not something that necessarily makes sense if we ignore the reality of the experience of the individual. It is a future thinking that produces scenarios where we imagine speculative alternatives.
We can design around a reality toward a desired future state, but let us not forget that the real worlds of the people are a mix of family, work, personal goals, immediate needs, uncertainties, etc.
Today, with advances in technology and with the instruments at our disposal, we expand the context of our interaction we connect with a wide range of people from different disciplines and can collaborate with the goal of creating something new and with value.
Truly collaborative processes embrace different points of view, even those that are conflicting, allowing their merger and creating something new and never before imagined.
Today and tomorrow our need to collaborate will be constant and so I leave a reflection point, citing Jamais Cascio:
“Focusing only the challenges of the present may seem imperative, especially when those challenges are massive and frightening. But without a sense of what’s next, a capacity for understanding connections and horizons, and a vision of what kind of world we want, our efforts to deal with today’s problems will inevitably leave us weakened, vulnerable, and blind to challenges to come.”
Do you want to comment?
This post is inspired in an old one from this blog!
- Transforming a Manager into a Leader with a Design Thinking Mindset
- Interdisciplinarity and data science on the road to innovation
- They are not analog, they are not digital … they are people!
- Shake up cognitive dissonance and embrace innovation
- Tacit knowledge is a trigger and a lever for innovation! Is it true?
TagsAnalyses and intuition Art and innovation Ask questions Assumptions and innovation Behavior and innovation Behavior change Business model Business models Collaboration and innovation Connections and creativity Create value Creativity and diversity Creativity and empathy Creativity and sustainability Critical thinking Designthinking Design thinking and business Diversity and creativity Diversity and Innovation Emotional experiences Empathy and innovation Evaluation of ideas Innovation and Human Resources Innovation and Management Innovation and networks Innovation and observation Innovation and possibilities Innovation and trust Innovation Culture Inovattion Institute for the Future Interception of ideas Intuitive thinking Making decisions Marty Neumeir Motivation and collaboration Open Innovation Services Passion and creativity Protoypes Resistance to change Rethinking options Simplicity and innovation Time and creativity values and innovation White space
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- February 2016
- March 2014
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011